New and improved
Ahh. Another robot to entertain me. Awesome! :D

“Excuse me? Do I look like I was made to amuse you?”

HUGS! *suddenly, kindness fox out of nowhere attempting to administer one of his trademark tackle-hugs*
Anonymous

One swift step to the side later,

“No, bad fox anon! No jumping in the lab.”

twiborg replied to your post: twiborg replied to your post: ((Almost forgot this…
I could take over again, if you want me to.

pegasus-cloud-kicker replied to your post: twiborg replied to your post: ((Almost forgot this…
Three?

 1. At the very least I could just give you the login details, its just an email address made only for this blog.

2. Yeah three. Aperture in Equestria, Android Sparkle and one character on the “Hard Code and Erudessa” blog.

twiborg replied to your post: ((Almost forgot this thing still exists.))
I know that feel from when I ran it.

Running three active blogs just isn’t practical for me.

((Almost forgot this thing still exists.))

((Not dead, just not really being paid any attention.))

((So, the pony A.S. is based on, retconed.))

twiborg:

android-sparkle:

((Does that change anything for this blog? Or does Android Sparkle continue as she always has been?))

(She continues. Twiborg was “deleted” and replaced, but what she did was not changed. It’s like Pokemon Mystery Dungeon: Explorers of time/darkness.

Best example I have.)

((Works for me. I like simple stuff like that. Maybe now the two can carry on a less than condescending conversation for once.))

((So, the pony A.S. is based on, retconed.))

((Does that change anything for this blog? Or does Android Sparkle continue as she always has been?))

puddingfuzz:

aperture-in-equestria replied to your post: I’m so fresh yo can suck my nutz

“You do know that your administrator would fire you for wasting a thermonuclear warhead on some unkillable Greyface, right?”

Who says we’d have to use a warhead? We’ve got some chambers built specifically to generate and house a nuclear inferno. Anon would be more than welcome to spend some time in one.

“Sounds like a waste of Plutonium if you ask me.”

GLaDOS: "My judgement cannot change simply due to time. Fifty thousand years could pass and I would still be testing and still doing science. Also considering the number of times that /mute lunatic/ has tried and/or succeeded to kill me, I highly doubt I'll ever do anything to destroy myself."

“Well, there you have it.”

Since you're patterned from an organic mind, like most types of smart/sapient ai's in science fiction, most of those stories imply an upper age limit beyond which an AI's judgment becomes questionable and/or they directly or indirectly destroy themselves. Do you believe you have such limitations? and if so how do you plan to deal with this eventuality?

“This would really be a question for GLaDOS, but I suppose I can function indefinitely, so long as I maintain myself. 

…Speaking of, where’d that can of air go?”